Determining Patent Valuation with Patent Prosecution Analytics
Patent practitioners are turning to patent analytics to uncover key insights.
Why Patent Valuation?
There are many reasons to assess intellectual property or a patent application’s value. Before investing, venture capitalists may wish to value the company’s patent portfolio to help determine the company’s value and the risk of the investment. For small companies, a valuable patent could be their ticket to needed funding. Companies who want to sell their patents, or who go through mergers and acquisitions, need to know the value of their patents so they can sell at an equitable price. On a more personal level, applicants with pending patent applications can weigh their patent application’s potential value against the cost of patent prosecution decisions to help develop an efficient patent prosecution strategy.
What Affects Patent Valuation?
The most common patent value indicators are not available until long after a patent has been issued. A patent’s litigation history, for example, can provide key insights into the scope and strength of a granted patent, but it is only useful in circumstances where litigation has actually occurred.
A patent’s value can be decided through various techniques. Methods of patent valuation are usually organized into three integral approaches: the “market approach,” the “cost approach,” and the “income approach.” Each approach has a unique perspective of value, so depending on the patent, one specific approach may be more relevant than another.
Market Approach: When determining the value of an asset, the market approach strongly takes into consideration the price that was paid for the asset or comparable assets that were purchased around the valuation date. Similar patents can be evaluated to find general market value and what is a fair price for the current offering. This approach works best for tangible assets.
Cost Approach: The cost approach generally considers a
‘replacement cost’ by analyzing out-of-pocket expenses, lost sales, risks, and other economic outcomes associated with alternative technology. The cost approach focuses on ensuring that the investor will not pay any more for an asset than what it would cost to create or purchase a new asset of equal utility. Comparing that state of competitor patents can also affect cost approach as a crowded patent category offers less value.
Income Approach: The income approach tends to be the most used and reliable valuation method. This approach determines asset value based on the future income flows the asset is expected to achieve. The more the patent is tied directly to revenue, allows for premium pricing, or drives the sale of related products, the higher the income valuation will be. Income valuation can also be affected by the industry or nicheness of the patent. If the use-cases for the patent are few and the sales far in between, there will be less income resulting from the patent and therefore a lower income valuation.
Evaluating the value of pending patent applications can be much more difficult because there is less information to draw upon. Due to the complexity of valuing patent applications and patent portfolios composed of patent applications, any hint at a patent’s value can be informative. As a result, more patent practitioners are turning to patent analytics to uncover key insights that can be used to help determine the value of early-stage patent documents.
Patent Application Value Indicators
Valuing a patent application is particularly difficult because, in addition to determining the potential strength and market value of the patent application, the overall cost and likelihood of the patent being granted should also be taken into account. Fortunately, the LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® patent prosecution platform has several tools to help predict outcomes and value patent applications at various stages of the patent process.
LexisNexis PathWays™ – The PathWays™ tool, available on the PatentAdvisor® platform, can help patent applicants assess the difficulty of future prosecution based on the content of a patent application even before it is filed. The PathWays tool uses keywords to predict which USPTO art units are most likely to evaluate a patent application. PathWays also provides patent statistics about those likely art units and can indicate how difficult and expensive patent prosecution will be. With this information, patent applicants can gain a sense for their odds against the USPTO, and can adjust their valuation of the patent application accordingly.
Examiner ETA® – After filing, and once a patent examiner has been assigned, PatentAdvisor provides users with the most predictive patent metric available. PatentAdvisor calculates an ETA™ value for ehubach USPTO patent examiner. Based on several patent statistics, this ETA™ can be used to predict how patent prosecution will play out. For example, patent examiners with low ETA values are statistically very likely to issue patents quickly and with few changes to a patent application’s claims. Patent examiners with high ETA values, on the other hand, have a low likelihood of granting a patent and, if a patent is granted, then it will most likely be granted after significant changes. Because low-ETA patent applications are much more likely to have favorable prosecution outcomes, they often have greater perceived value than patent applications assigned to patent examiners with high ETA values.
PatentAdvisor Patent Statistics –
As patent prosecution progresses, patent applicants are often faced with many strategic decisions. The PatentAdvisor platform provides several patent statistics that can be used to more effectively navigate the patent process. For example, should an applicant need to decide between filing an RCE or an appeal, PatentAdvisor can show users how other patent applicants fared against their patent examiner in similar situations. Patent applicants can use this information to choose the path that is most likely to result in a granted patent, and can assess the patent application’s value based on its likelihood of being issued.
LexisNexis® IP offers patent prosecution solutions to help assign value to patent applications in all stages of the patent process. For more information on valuing patent applications, check out “Prosecuting for Value: Identifying and Creating Perceived Patent Strength.”
Get to know your examiner better with more context and a deeper understanding of your examiner’s behavior than ever available before.
With your free trial, you will gain instant access to:
Examiner Search allows you to search by examiner name for a filterable, examiner specific dashboard of patent analytics, including rejection specific statistics, appeal statistics, prosecution statistics, interview statistics, a backlog of RCEs and timeline.
QuickPair easily replaces the USPTO Public PAIR by providing the most robust application details anywhere, including examiner timeline, examiner allowance rate and the average time and number of office actions to allowance.
PatentAdvisor, the first-ever data-driven patent strategy tool, provides a systemic approach to crafting an effective prosecution strategy. Understand why certain patent applications take longer than others to reach allowance—then use that knowledge to devise better patent prosecution strategies.