Patent attorneys can now make sense of large repositories of prosecution information that had not been possible previously due to the sheer amount of unstructured data by using proprietary technology within LexisNexis PatentAdvisor®. One such area is the nebulous category of published and granted patent applications. These documents include responses to office actions, correspondence from the examiner and other voluminous collections of secondary sources relevant to the prosecution process.

Attorneys can perform a simple search of vast volumes of patent documents to quickly and easily find relevant information with the PatDocSearch feature, exclusive to PatentAdvisor™. The ability to search patent documents can be helpful when faced with a rejection that may seem obscure or confusing. A patent document search engine and text-searchable database allows you to search other applicants’ responses for particular language cited by the examiner in the rejection. This can provide you with context for the rejection, and potential strategies to overcome the rejection.

For example, perhaps your examiner often repeats a certain phrase when issuing rejections: “[The examiner] is not giving patentable weight to [your] non-functional descriptive.” Despite your comprehensive response, the examiner still rejects your application on those same grounds. You can enter this phrase as a query in a patent document search engine and find other office actions and responses from other applications containing the same language. Search filters provide attorneys with the ability to narrow down search results to applications that are pending, allowed or abandoned, allowing you to quickly see which applicants were successful in overcoming this particular rejection. You can then further filter patent documents in successful applications to see only responses containing this phrase in order to see the arguments and reasoning other applicants took to overcome this rejection and put their application on a path to allowance.

In addition to searching specific documents for phrases, you can also view statistics such as the rate at which the examiner cites this particular phrase in a rejection and the relevant success rate of applicants who are faced with this rejection. For instance, this rejection may be prevalent, appearing in 85% of rejections by the examiner with only a 5% allowance rate for applications facing this rejection. These statistics can help attorneys determine if the rejection they are facing is common or obscure, and the likelihood of their application making it to allowance given the rejection.

Now you are able to easily search all published and granted patent documents, including office actions, responses and appeals with PatDocSearch. Search results can be quickly pared down to the most relevant office actions, responses and appeal briefs using filters. This innovative tool allows you to not only understand the context of the rejections you are facing, but also gives you insight into the best route to allowance for your patent applications.

LexisNexis PatentAdvisor®

Two-Day Trial

Get to know your examiner better with more context and a deeper understanding of your examiner’s behavior than ever available before.

With your free trial, you will gain instant access to:

Examiner Search allows you to search by examiner name for a filterable, examiner specific dashboard of patent analytics, including rejection specific statistics, appeal statistics, prosecution statistics, interview statistics, a backlog of RCEs and timeline.

QuickPair easily replaces the USPTO Public PAIR by providing the most robust application details anywhere, including examiner timeline, examiner allowance rate and the average time and number of office actions to allowance.

PatentAdvisor, the first-ever data-driven patent strategy tool, provides a systemic approach to crafting an effective prosecution strategy. Understand why certain patent applications take longer than others to reach allowance—then use that knowledge to devise better patent prosecution strategies.

Free Trial

Related Content

Webinar: Dissecting Alice at 5 – The Good, Bad & the Ugly Listen as Gene Quinn, President and CEO of IPWatchdog, Inc. hosts a special free webinar discussion focusing on the Alice decision five years later. J...
A Patent Examiner’s Take on ETA What might a USPTO examiner have to say about this new way to approach patent prosecution? The newest LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® metric has prov...
How to Improve Patent Prosecution Strategy The proliferation of data analytics tools has changed the way that patent practitioners approach their work. Many new features offered in these...

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. Cookie Policy

이 웹 사이트의 쿠키 설정은 "쿠키 허용"으로 설정되어 최상의 브라우징 환경을 제공합니다. 쿠키 설정을 변경하지 않고 이 웹 사이트를 계속 사용하거나 아래의 "동의"를 클릭하면 동의하는 것입니다.